Mass Demonstration or Violent Crackdown—Lose-Lose for
All
The Cambodia Daily 14-08-2013
This opinion is apolitical. I write
out of concern for the Cambodian people and the country.
The news of a possible opposition
CNRP-led mass demonstration and the CPP’s response to deploy armed forces and
armored personnel carriers (APCs) in and around Phnom Penh looks like both political
camps are heading toward confrontation.
Even more worrisome are the
contradictory statements from within the CNRP and the ruling party about their
respective intentions. If a mass demonstration takes place and the government
reacts with force, both political parties and the country as a whole will lose.
If there is a mass protest, the big
question for the CNRP is how to keep it peaceful? How can it guarantee control
over every protesters’ movement, gestures and words? Any provocative move or
slogan from a few demonstrators may invite a response from the armed forces
with the potential to inflame chaos and violence. If such a scenario were to
occur, the CNRP’s leaders would be held, if not legally, morally responsible
for casualties and loss of lives.
The CNRP will surely disappoint many
of its supporters who voted for “change,” but change in a sense for a more
peaceful, prosperous, just and civilized nation, not a change to violence,
tragedy and backwardness.
If the CPP uses force to suppress
demonstrators, it faces three major risks. Firstly, the party’s leaders may be
liable to prosecution by either local or international courts. Secondly, if the
violent crackdown fails to scare people away and reduce the number of
demonstrators but instead inspires more people to take to the streets, this
could spillover to other provinces throughout the country.
Some of the CPP’s officials and
members of the military and the police (especially those mid-level and
low-ranking officers) will have to ask themselves the question—should I stay or
should I go? Any defection by members of the ruling party and the military will
greatly damage the government’s legitimacy; affect the psychology of those who
stay and possibly provide an excuse for foreign countries to intervene
militarily.
If there are tens or hundreds of
thousands of people joining the demonstration, it would not be surprising for
the soldiers and police to find their friends and relatives among the
protesters.
Thirdly, violent action will tarnish
the ruling party’s image as the guardian of peace and political stability.
History has informed us that
negotiation and settling of disputes by peaceful means is the door to lasting
peace and social harmony. Violent means cause revenge and tragedy.
Cambodian voters regardless of
political tendencies value peace, social harmony and the country’s prosperity.
And they have already fulfilled their obligation as a good citizen by voting.
Now it is the turn of the leaders of
both parties to demonstrate that they truly care about: the people and the
country. The world is watching Cambodia. Let us prove that we are a civilized
race and a responsible world citizen by resolving the standoff peacefully.
Kimly Ngoun is a postgraduate
student at the Australian National University, Canberra
No comments:
Post a Comment