Translate

Monday, September 30, 2013

CAMBODIA: democrats must build new leaders and focus on nation-building

CAMBODIA: democrats must build new leaders and focus on nation-building


FOR PUBLICATION
AHRC-ETC-032-2013
September 30, 2013

An article by Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth published by the Asian Human Rights Commission


As per his usual custom, sixty-year-old King Norodom Sihamoni clasps his hands in a show of traditional Khmer respect, his face wears a ready soft and gentle smile. The king was a graceful dancer in his youth and is known never to have wanted to be king.

Buffeted by the political winds, however, on Monday, Sept 23, the king acceded to the demands of the Cambodian People's Party leaders, who insisted that the king perform his constitutional responsibility and open the inaugural session of Cambodia's fifth parliament despite ongoing challenges to the legitimacy of the election that gave the CPP a slim majority. The National Assembly was half empty. Only 68 of the 123 seats were occupied. Elected delegates from the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party were 200 kilometers away at Angkor Wat, taking their own symbolic oath to be faithful to the people's will.

Last Sept 7, tens of thousands of voters and supporters of the CNRP gathered at Freedom Park in Phnom Penh, and gathered again on Sept 15, 16, 17, carrying candles, incense, and lotus flowers, protesting alleged election irregularities and fraud that sanctioned the awarding by the CPP-appointed National Election Committee of a 13 seat advantage in the National Assembly to the CPP – 68 seats to 55 for the CNRP. Protesters endorsed CNRP's persistent demand for an independent election probe to investigate the allegations of fraud and provide voters with "truth and justice."

The king, who "shall reign but shall not govern" (Article 7 of Cambodia's 1993 Constitution), was pressed to fulfill his constitutional duty to convene the first session of the National Assembly, "no later than sixty days after the election" (Art. 82), though in fact the convening could have occurred as late as September 26th, 60 days after the July 28th election.

Pandora's Box


A Pandora's box was opened with the king's fateful action. Tossed aside were some half a million signatures from Cambodian citizens and Buddhist monks who were blocked from reaching the royal palace to submit cartons of petitions pleading for the king to delay the opening of the National Assembly. Also ignored was the opposition's warning that it would boycott a parliamentary opening that occurred before CNRP-CPP talks aimed at resolving the election disputes were concluded.
The king's action transformed the half empty assembly of 68 lawmakers from a single party into a National Assembly. A day after, on Sept 24, in an oral vote 68 CPP legislators approved Hun Sen as Prime Minister, and his new cabinet as the Royal Government of Cambodia. A royal decree formalized the events.

Increasing numbers of Cambodians have become vocal. They see the king as having disregarded the popular will which seemed to support a delay of the opening of the National Assembly.  As such, these protesters assert that the king has failed two other of his constitutional roles.  He does not in this instance represent a "symbol of unity and eternity of the Khmer nation" (Art.8), or to have fulfilled his "august role of arbitrator to ensure the faithful execution of public powers" (Art. 9).

Upset Cambodians also question the royal decree that installed Hun Sen as Prime Minister, as he was rejected by voters in his home province according to the CPP's own ballot count, trailing his CNRP challenger by 104,000 votes.  Nor, logic follows, should Hun Sen's cabinet appointees have been approved to comprise the Royal Government of Cambodia for the five year term ending in 2018.
Where, Cambodians ask, is an impartial investigation of what most agree was an election plagued with significant irregularities? What, they ask, has happened to the free and fair elections espoused in the 1991 Paris Peace Accords that ended the long Cambodian civil war?

Protests have been largely peaceful, but as the regime long in power sought to move events along, its hands off façade began to shred. The evening before the opening session of the National Assembly, men in surgical masks wielding riot guns, watched by military police who later joined them, attacked protesters with batons, slingshots and electric prods, injuring seven journalists, mostly photographers, covering the peaceful protest. Reporters Without Borders referred to the attack as "Deliberate violence against journalists covering peaceful protests."

In truth, even people who sympathize with the CPP think there is a need for change, a need for new leadership. An overwhelming number of Cambodia's 15 million people have been born since the Khmer Rouge were ousted and chafe at the continuation of the Hun Sen regime, now in place since 1985.  The CPP, in fact, has ruled even longer, since 1979. This is the only government most Cambodians have known. They are ready for change.

Even as the official election results show a reduction in CPP-held seats from 90 to 68, published findings in several audits, including the government's own, report one in ten registered voters was left off the voters' lists; and the US-based National Democratic Institute's audit found another tenth of names on the new list did not belong to real people, but to "ghost voters." The CNRP claimed more than 3 million votes were "misappropriated" by the CPP.

For his part, Hun Sen insists on the constitutional rule that a 50 percent plus one majority allows the CPP to form a new government regardless of what anyone thinks. For Hun Sen, a government decreed by the king is legitimate. The CNRP sees it as a product of a "constitutional coup."
Constitutionally a new Khmer government comes into being with the approval of the National Assembly, which, as Art. 76 stipulates, "consists of at least 120 members."

International Relations 

The United States and the European Union have been consistent in their calls for "a transparent review of irregularities" in Cambodia's elections, the participation of both political parties in the National Assembly, the working together of the CNRP and the CPP to resolve electoral reforms, among other suggested reforms.

China, too, has been consistent in her immediate support for Hun Sen and the CPP. Chinese Premier Li Keqiang congratulated Hun Sen on his reappointment as Prime Minister at the opening of the National Assembly.

According to the Phnom Penh Post, 18 foreign envoys attended the opening ceremony of the National Assembly, including US Ambassador William Todd, who created a political flap when he, perhaps inadvisably, was photographed with both arms raised and both hands signaling a "V" sign. The import was, at best, ambiguous. The embassy insisted the "V" was meant to indicate Peace, but others took the alternative meaning, Victory. It was observed that Ambassador Todd avoided Hun Sen and the embassy noted that the ambassador's presence did not imply support for the election results.

As Cambodians debated endlessly each capital's policies toward the two major political parties, UN Special Rapporteur on Cambodia Surya Subedi noted, "roughly half of the population voted for one party and half for the other," and "It is critical for the New National Assembly to be represented by the two key parties . . . to be truly representatives of the whole of the Cambodian people."

The Old Fox is back


Feeling safe and again empowered at a ceremony re-installing him as Prime Minister, Hun Sen cast aside the low-key persona he had adopted over the last few months in favor of the bellicose leader more familiar to the Cambodian people. In lengthy remarks, Hun Sen sought to sow doubts among CNRP supporters worldwide by asserting that during their talks to find a solution to the disputed election outcomes, Sam Rainsy had abandoned his demand for an independent investigation committee into alleged election irregularities and fraud and requested for himself the position of parliament president. According to Hun Sen, "Sam Rainsy added that the CNRP would accept (the official result that) CPP (won) 68 (National Assembly seats) and CNRP, 55."

Hun Sen claimed the CNRP-CPP talks collapsed because he, Hun Sen, refused to give the presidency of the National Assembly to Sam Rainsy. Hun Sen listed what assembly posts Sam Rainsy wanted for the CNRP, and what Hun Sen said he was willing to give.

While Hun Sen told the press that the CPP still maintained "the door open for negotiation" with the CNRP, he threatened at a cabinet meeting to release an audio recording of the conversation with Sam Rainsy if the CNRP persists in holding demonstrations.

CNRP Vice President Kem Sokha hit back immediately: Hun Sen is "concerned and nervous" about the mass movement in support of the CNRP and popular demands to know the truth about election irregularities. To CNRP officials, Hun Sen's threat to release the audio recording is a familiar tactic, one he has employed in the past, taking comments out of context to serve his purposes. The CNRP said it welcomes the release of the unedited tape in its entirety. Kem Sokha said the CNRP has nothing to hide. There were 6 other CNRP officials with Sam Rainsy at the first talks; 14 at the second. Kem Sokha contended that at the Sept 14-15 CNRP-CPP meetings, the CNRP persistently demanded investigation of election fraud.

On Sept 25, Sam Rainsy told a press conference at CNRP headquarters in Phnom Penh that the opposition's boycott of the National Assembly will continue: "We will not cooperate in any manner with the present National Assembly and with the present government unless there are guarantees that there will be an investigation committee to investigate the election irregularities and to find justice for the voters, whose will has been distorted," and "a program of reforms that both parties can agree upon."
He also said, "We will conduct a worldwide campaign to delegitimize this government, which is the result of a constitutional coup and which does not represent the Cambodian people."

Yet, the best way to delegitimize this government is for the Cambodian people to stop their submission, obedience and cooperation with it.

Sam Rainsy announced the opposition's intention to hold a one-day nationwide general strike of factory workers, civil servants, and shopkeepers.

A senior official of the CNRP told me the CNRP has the people on its side; the CPP's only remaining tool is brute force; the CNRP has opted for nonviolence to oppose armed men. It is like a breath of fresh air to be told of Cambodians' brave efforts to disassociate themselves from a culture of violence.

The Water Buffalo 

Generally, Cambodians' behavior is guided more by outbursts of emotion than by reasoned, calm thinking. Another observer has suggested that this tendency to react emotionally reflects the persistent theme of violence in Khmer culture generally. He referenced Australian scholar John Tully, who wrote about the late King Father's grandfather, King Norodom. King Norodom said, "Cambodia is like a water buffalo, placid but capable of becoming terrible in his rage."

Hun Sen is one such water buffalo. He wants what he wants and when he wants it. His rage has allowed him to commit incredible acts of inhumanity. One can imagine that the public face of equanimity he displayed during the election was founded in his supreme confidence of victory, not by a desire to avoid violence.

Back to Negotiations?

Hun Sen's rejection of an independent election probe committee shows he fears that fraud will be revealed.  He is not prepared to relinquish power, having said he intends to remain as Prime Minister until he is (at least) 74.  Instead, in a marathon speech of more than six hours, Hun Sen enumerated the reforms he and his government will undertake.  One might think this reform agenda was motivated by his realization that his popularity is waning. But according to the Cambodia Daily, "Hun Sen's 6-Hour Reform Promise Met With Yawns." In the Phnom Penh Post, political analyst Kem Ley expressed skepticism about Hun Sen's reforms: "I've listened to him for 20 years, I hear the same song sung around the election every year."

Surely Hun Sen knows he cannot govern indefinitely with a government and a parliament devoid of opposition members. And surely Sam Rainsy, too, knows he cannot stay forever on the sidelines of the political process that requires fixing, that the CNRP will have to take its seats in the National Assembly in order to affect the legislation and have a legitimate political platform from which to speak.  This stand-off cannot continue for long.

As of this writing CNRP leader Sam Rainsy has let it be known that opposition legislators will take up their seats in the National Assembly "after we hold negotiations with the CPP." First on a list of 10 demands is investigation to "assess and address" election irregularities. Sam Rainsy was reported in the Phnom Penh Post to have said the CNRP is interested in "transparent" negotiations: "We want to present our ideas clearly, and we want to (share them)."

Reality and the Wonderland 

There are men who see reality as it exists and deal with it. They can use imagination, creativity, and positive thinking to deal with problems, or they can learn to cope with predicaments while searching for an acceptable solution. Inflexibility keeps situations frozen in place and destroys any hope of progress.

There are those who embrace a world of make believe, where shortcomings are denied and others are blamed when things go wrong. Hun Sen rewrites history to serve his purposes. Sam Rainsy chooses to blast the Vietnamese "swallowers of Khmer soil" to deflect awareness of his own inability to bring Hun Sen to justice.

I don't expect some Cambodian democrats to like what I write today. But the sooner democrats come to realize that Hun Sen is not going anywhere in the short term, the better. It is wiser to invest energy in building unity and solidarity through nonviolent approaches, to use this five year period to consolidate resources, develop depth in a leadership cadre, learn the skills of governing in order to chip away little by little the regime's autocracy and injustice through existing political mechanisms and processes. In this way, democrats may help the Khmer nation reach its highest interests in liberty, justice, and the rule of law.

I would like to repeat what I have often written: Democrats must work tirelessly to build leaders by the thousands and to focus seriously on nation building.

.................

Dr. Gaffar: The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do not necessarily reflect its own.

About the Author:

Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States. He can be reached at peangmeth@gmail.com.

Cambodia Returns to a One-Party State

Cambodia Returns to a One-Party State

The Diplomat - September 30, 2013
By Colin Meyn

After being sworn into office last week, Hun Sen became the leader of a one-party Cambodian state for the second time in his life. The first time it happened was in 1985, when Hanoi promoted him to prime minister of what was then the socialist People’s Republic of Kampuchea, beginning the rule of one of the world’s longest-serving leaders. It happened again in a carefully orchestrated ceremony in Phnom Penh on September 23, presided over by King Norodom Sihamoni, the nominal head of democratic Cambodia.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Less than two months ago, the Western world was applauding Cambodia’s July 28 parliamentary elections as a turning point for democracy in the country. The opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) won a shocking 55 out of 123 seats in the National Assembly, despite a litany of failures in the electoral process that skewed the vote heavily in favor of Hun Sen’s Cambodian People’s Party (CPP).

E.U. High Commissioner Katherine Ashton could hardly contain her enthusiasm in a letter to opposition leader Sam Rainsy in the days following the ballot. “The preliminary results of the parliamentary elections in Cam­bodia show remarkable gains by your party and I would like to congratulate you on this achievement,” she wrote.

The opposition had doubled its representation in parliament, the biggest blow to the CPP in 20 years. However, that wasn’t good enough for the CNRP or its nearly 3 million supporters. Emboldened by their success at the polls, Rainsy and his deputy, Kem Sokha, claimed that if not for manipulation of voter lists and outright electoral fraud, they would have won the election outright.  Calls for an investigation into the ballot became the opposition rallying cry.

On September 15, the day before Rainsy and Sokha sat down for top-level talks with Hun Sen to breach the political impasse, the CNRP began three days of mass demonstrations in the capital. More than 20,000 people turned out each day to cheer on CNRP leaders as they took their fight to the negotiating table. Nothing came of the talks.

The CNRP was willing to accept outright control of the National Assembly in exchange for validating a CPP-led government, a condition that Hun Sen told reporters days later was unacceptable as it would have thwarted the government and made it impossible for the CPP to pass a budget without the CNRP’s approval. So the prime minister, who was defeated in 1993 elections by the royalist Funcinpec party but never ceded control of the government, pushed ahead with forming a new government without an opposition party.

With the blessing of the monarch, 68 CPP lawmakers took their oaths on September 23 and unanimously voted in Hun Sen as the head of the new government. After 20 years of democracy, and billions of dollars spent by the U.N. to get Cambodia back on its feet after more than a decade of civil war following the brutal Khmer Rouge regime, Cambodia has returned to being a one-party state.

In many ways, things are now back to normal. In the weeks following the election, Hun Sen was eerily silent. People were left to speculate on what was going on within his party as heavily armed troops and armored personnel carriers inexplicably rolled into Phnom Penh. The day after his new government was made official, the prime minister was acting like himself again. He delivered an epic six-hour speech that was broadcast over the radio and on nine CPP-friendly television stations. Barbed-wire barricades that had blocked many central streets in the capital, which the government said were necessary for security purposes as the new government was sworn in, were taken down. As it has for the past 15 years, the opposition party could only shout about the injustice of it all.

But Hun Sen knows this is not the old opposition. His marathon speech laid out a broad program of reforms, many of which echoed the populist campaign platform that proved so successful for the CNRP during campaign season, including higher wages across the board and more transparency and accountability in government. If Hun Sen doesn’t implement significant reforms over the next five years, he faces two options: be crushed at the polls in 2018 and give up power peacefully or call off democracy altogether and become “the next Burma,” relying on Chinese largesse as he suppresses domestic discontent.

The opposition, meanwhile, thinks it has little to gain by joining a National Assembly controlled by the CPP. It’s most hardline supporters won’t accept anything less than an overthrow of the current regime, while even the most moderate CNRP supporters can agree that giving legitimacy to Hun Sen without being guaranteed a check to his power would be a waste of the party’s newfound popularity.

After almost 20 years fighting against the CPP, Rainsy told The Diplomat that he has learned that serving as a parliamentary opposition to Hun Sen, without mechanisms in place to ensure deep reforms and a balance of power, is pointless. “If we were in a country with an actual democracy, we would consider playing the role of the opposition. But the opposition in Cambodia…is denied any right, any power, any status, so it is totally ineffective. We need other forms of engagement to have checks and balance with the ruling party to ensure change. Cambodia’s political landscape has changed and the balance of power has changed. We have to define a totally new strategy,” he said.

What exactly that strategy will be is difficult to say, even for CNRP leaders. Responding to reporters at a press conference following the CPP’s formation of its new government, Rainsy said that the CNRP would launch a worldwide campaign to make Cambodia a pariah state, and raised the idea of conducting nationwide labor strikes to cripple the economy, which is dominated by CPP officials and their friends. The opposition has also promised more mass protests in Phnom Penh and throughout the provinces. But whether or not the opposition could rally enough support to push the Hun Sen to make the sort of concessions that the CNRP are pushing for is yet to be seen.

Rainsy says the opposition is happy to wait out the CPP as it struggles to achieve legitimacy after staging what he calls a “constitutional coup.” “We have the confidence that legitimacy is on our side. Given the level of popular support that we enjoy, there is a crisis of identity in the ruling party. We are not going to give legitimacy to a party like the CPP who has suffered precisely by losing legitimacy,” he said.

The Cambodian people will ultimately judge the wisdom of the CNRP’s refusal to take their seats during this post-election dispute, but foreign donors seem willing to maintain business as usual in Cambodia, even as the CNRP says the CPP must change its ways. Without sweeping international sanctions or a popular revolt, political analysts said there is no reason to believe that Hun Sen will be pressured to commit to make any immediate concessions to the CNRP that might jeopardize his grip on power in years to come.

Even if major Western donors were to cut aide, the CPP could still fall back on China, which in recent years has ramped up its cooperation with the CPP, committing to bloated investment projects and giving the government millions in no-strings-attached loans.

“Western governments would certainly prefer a negotiated deal [between the CPP and CNRP] rather than a lengthy CNRP boycott that forces them to choose whether to cut aid or not.  If the CPP is seen to be negotiating in good faith and offering meaningful concessions and pledges, there is little likelihood that donors will suspend aid or cooperation,” said John Ciorciari, a Southeast Asia expert at the University of Michigan’s Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy. “If the situation worsens and Western donors do curtail aid, the CPP has other sources of revenue and international support to help it survive for an extended period if it is rebuffed by the West,” he wrote in an email.

Carlyle Thayer, an emeritus professor of Southeast Asian studies at the Australian Defence Forces Academy, said that by staying out of parliament altogether, the CNRP would struggle to claim credit for any reforms that are made in the next five years, adding that an extended campaign of mass demonstrations risked pushing the ruling party to use their sizeable security forces to protect its power.


“The CPP can definitely remain in power over the next five years with or without the CNRP. If the CNRP abnegates its role as an opposition party it will leave the CPP unopposed. This will be a terrible disappointment to the CNRP’s support base,” Thayer wrote in an email. “The real concern should be over whether or not an embattled CPP regime will revert to its default position of authoritarian rule. If the opposition mounts a strong challenge in terms of mass demonstrations…then Hun Sen is liable to use repressive means justified on dubious legal grounds.”

With little hope of isolating the CPP government, the CNRP can either attempt to conduct prolonged and widespread acts of civil disobedience or find a way to explain to its supporters why its formidable contingent of parliamentarians will take their seats in the National Assembly despite having won few up-front concessions from the CPP.

“I’m not sure what the CNRP’s current strategy is, but given that the world is seemingly willing to proceed as though the current unconstitutional government is actually legal, this limits their options,” said Simon Springer, a Cambodia expert and professor of geography and Southeast Asian studies at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. “They can either hope for mass upheaval among the populace that brings the current government down, or they can try to make nice and get down to business within the National Assembly by making life difficult for CPP lawmakers. The former is a hugely risky approach, while the later requires them to swallow their pride.”

Investing in Cambodia’s Youth: A Path to Progress

Investing in Cambodia’s Youth: A Path to Progress

The Cambodia Herald 29-09-2013
By William E. Todd

Thanks once again for taking the time to read my weekly column.  I continue to be impressed with the questions you send me because they demonstrate a keen concern for the future of Cambodia.  In the past week, one reader pointedly asked, “How can Cambodia stay focused on progress?”

In the past few weeks, I have shared with you my ideas about the road ahead for reform and peaceful democracy in action.  I think those are two key components of the answer to this reader’s question.  Also critical for progress are investing in Cambodia’s youth, reducing poverty, and improving health care and nutrition for children.  Raising the living standards of average Cambodians and providing opportunities for young people will drive Cambodia’s future development.

As you may know already, I am the father of four children, and promoting the welfare of young people is an issue that I care deeply about.  That’s why I am so pleased that Cambodia will be a focus country for the U.S. government’s Action Plan on Children in Adversity.  Just last week, I sat down with several important partners to discuss this initiative which will implement a strategy to improve children’s health, promote their care within the family, and help to protect them from becoming victims of trafficking, labor exploitation, violence, and abuse.  As the strategy recognizes, meeting the developmental needs of children in their earliest years gives them the best chance to be happy and productive as adults. 

To support children as they grow into adulthood, we also need to focus on people’s basic needs, like health care and nutrition.  That is why the U.S. government continues to support Cambodia through programs like Feed the Future.  The prevalence of underweight Cambodian children under the age of five dropped from 45 percent in 2002 to 36 percent in 2005.  Building on that success is the objective of Feed the Future, President Obama’s global hunger and food security initiative.  One component of Feed the Future is the Harvest program which is helping Cambodian families to learn new farming techniques and grow more food, thus increasing their incomes and improving their nutrition.

The United States has also invested more than $150 million in HIV/AIDS funding in Cambodia to help primarily young adults.  Cambodia’s young adult HIV infection rate has been reduced by half since 1998, and more Cambodians are now living productive lives with HIV/AIDS, in part due to the expertise and resources provided through the U.S. government.  U.S. government health programs also have helped to lower child mortality rates by more than 50 percent since 2000, and helped to reduce deaths of mothers related to childbirth by 56 percent from 2005 to 2010.  These remarkable achievements are contributing to the future success of average Cambodians.

Ensuring a safer working environment is another way Cambodia can improve the quality of life for its people, especially young adults.  On September 6 in my blog, I wrote about the Better Factories Cambodia (BFC) program which has made a dramatic impact on workplace safety in the garment industry and helped improve livelihoods for Cambodians by combining worker safety with access to U.S. markets.  BFC was created in 2001, and by 2012 the United States purchased $2.6 billion worth of Cambodian garments and footwear and accounted for nearly 20 percent of Cambodia’s GDP.  These numbers reflect the success of the program.

The U.S. government is working to help make the daily lives of all Cambodian people safer, more secure, healthier, and more prosperous.  But like all effective partnerships, success only comes from working together and listening to each other’s needs.  Our commitment to progress is a direct response to the needs and aspirations of the Cambodian people.  As they have repeatedly reminded us, for the country to continue its progress, reform is essential.  In recent weeks, leaders from both major parties have spoken to the importance of reform.

As I mentioned in my previous columns, I am an optimist about Cambodia’s future.  The great American business pioneer Henry Ford summed it up best when he said, “Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success.”  Working together by investing in Cambodia’s youth today will reap rewards for generations to come.  I wish everyone a happy, healthy, and safe Pchum Ben holiday.

Friday, September 27, 2013

CNRP ready to talk

CNRP ready to talk

The Phnom Penh Post: 27 September 2013

Following a high-level meeting yesterday, Cambodia National Rescue Party leader Sam Rainsy said that his party would seek to restart negotiations with the ruling party and possibly join the government.

The move marks an apparent about-turn from a party press conference held on Wednesday when Rainsy threatened a general strike against the “illegitimate” government and said the CNRP’s leverage would be strongest if it remained outside parliament.

“I just want to inform you that we would consider taking up seats in the National Assembly after we hold negotiations with the CPP,” Rainsy told the Post yesterday evening.

“In those negotiations, we are going to ask for immediate reforms that require no time and no money to implement.”

Rainsy added that his party had drawn up a list of 10 demands, the first of which remains an investigation to “assess and address” election irregularities.

Immediate measures required by the opposition would include a halt of deforestation and land grabs by private companies granted economic land concessions.

These two issues were mentioned in the government’s five-year strategy released on Wednesday.

Following the approval of the cabinet in a single, unanimous vote at the National Assembly on Tuesday, Prime Minister Hun Sen told reporters that the CPP – for its part – still had “the door open for renegotiation” with the opposition.

The CNRP has maintained that the swearing-in of the government without the 55 opposition lawmakers present amounted to a “constitutional coup”.

Rainsy also said yesterday that the CNRP would ask for the establishment of a mechanism that included the opposition, civil society representatives and local community members to ensure any promised reforms are properly implemented.

Hun Sen on Wednesday threatened to release recordings on Facebook proving the CNRP had agreed to abandon its call for an investigation in return for top National Assembly positions during negotiations last week.

Perhaps in response to that, the CNRP president yesterday said that further negotiations would have to be “transparent”, to prove to the public that the party was not asking for government positions.

“We want to present our ideas clearly, and we want to share [them]. There will be no secret talks … and we would be happy if it would be broadcast nationally,” Rainsy said. “If there are any positions, it’s just to ensure the implementation of reforms. But most important are the reforms themselves.”

Political analyst Kem Ley said the change in the CNRP’s approach was a good move by the party, as it puts the people’s needs before politics.

“I think it’s good if they start to negotiate for in-depth reforms.… They should push the government to effectively manage immigration, land grabbing, anti-corruption, the fight against nepotism and also building the standard of public service,” he said.

Although the CNRP have yet to publicly release its 10-point reform agenda, Ley said he hoped it would target ineffective national mechanisms such as the Anti-Corruption Commission, the Human Rights Council and the Constitutional Council.

He added that the investigation into irregularities should not be used to change the election result but to reform the National Election Committee.

“They must think of all the challenges that happened since the start of the election, [not just the result],” he said.

Thursday, September 26, 2013

ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី ថា កម្ពុជា​កំពុង​ស្ថិត​លើ​ផ្លូវ​បំបែក​ឆ្ពោះ​ទៅ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ

ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី ថា កម្ពុជា​កំពុង​ស្ថិត​លើ​ផ្លូវ​បំបែក​ឆ្ពោះ​ទៅ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ


ភ្នំពេញប៉ុស្តិ៍ 26 កញ្ញា ២០១៣
 
លោក ស៊ូរិយ៉ា ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី ប្រេសិត​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​របស់​អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ ប្រចាំ​នៅ​កម្ពុជា បាន​ប្រាប់​ទៅ​អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ​កាល​ពី​ថ្ងៃ​អង្គារ​ថា កម្ពុជា​កំពុង​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ផ្លូវ​បំបែក​ដ៏​សំខាន់​មួយ​ក្នុង​វិថី​ឆ្ពោះ​ទៅ​ លទិ្ធ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ដែល​អាជ្ញាធរ​ត្រូវ​តែ​ជ្រើស​រើស រវាង​ការ​ទទួល​យក​នូវ​ការ​ផ្លាស់​ប្តូរ ឬ​ការ​បង្ក្រាប​លើ​ការ​មិន​ពេញ​ចិត្ត និង​ប្រឈម​នឹង​ផល​វិបាក។

នៅ​ចំពោះ​មុខ​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ នៅ​ទីក្រុង ហ្សឺណែវ លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី បាន​ថ្លែង​ថា ការ​វិល​ទៅ​ប្រើ «យុទ្ធសាស្រ្ត​ចាស់ ដែល​រំលោភ​សិទិ្ធ​ពលរដ្ឋ​ជា​មូលដ្ឋាន» ប៉ុន្មាន​ថ្ងៃ​ថ្មីៗ​នេះ បន្ទាប់​ពី​មាន​ការ​អត់ធ្មត់​ជា​ច្រើន​សប្តាហ៍​ដោយ​អាជ្ញាធរ បាន​បង្ហាញ​យ៉ាង​ច្បាស់​ថា ព្រះ​រាជាណាចក្រ​កម្ពុជា​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្នុង​ចំណុច​សំខាន់​មួយ។

កង​រាជ​អាវុធហត្ថ​រាប់​រយ​នាក់ បាន​បង្ខំ​ព្រះ​អង្គម្ចាស់ ស៊ីសុវត្ថិ ធម្មិកោ សមាជិក​គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង ឲ្យ​លះបង់​កូដកម្ម​បង្អត់​អាហារ​ជា​សាធារណៈ ដោយ​សន្តិវិធី កាល​ពី​សប្តាហ៍​មុន ខណៈ​ដែល​បាតុកម្ម​ភ្លើង​ទៀន ដោយ​សកម្មជន​តំបន់ បឹងកក់ រង​ការ​វាយ​ប្រហារ​ដោយ​បុរស​ពាក់​សម្លៀក​បំពាក់​ស៊ីវិល ដោយ​មាន​នគរបាល​ជួយ​ការពារ។

លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ថា៖ «រាល់​ប្រទេស​ទាំង​អស់​ដែល​ធ្វើ​អន្តរកាល​ឆ្ពោះ​ទៅ​លទិ្ធ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ ប្រឈម​នឹង​ខណៈ​មួយ​ដែល​ការ​គ្រប់​គ្រង​ត្រូវ​តែ​ផ្លាស់​ប្តូរ។ កម្ពុជា​កំពុង​ប្រឈម​នឹង​ខណៈ​នេះ ពេល​នេះ​» «ខ្ញុំ​សោក​ស្តាយ​ក្នុង​ការ​និយាយ​ថា វា​ហាក់​ដូច​ជា​មិន​ទាន់​យល់​នៅ​ឡើយ​ទេ នៅ​កម្ពុជា​ដែល​ផ្នែក​សំខាន់​នៃ​ដំណើរការ​លទិ្ធ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​គឺ សម្រាប់​ប្រជាជន​ទាំង​អស់​អាច​សម្តែង​មតិ​ដោយ​សេរី ហើយ​តួនាទី​របស់​រដ្ឋ ក្នុង​បាតុកម្ម​សន្តិវិធី​គឺ​ត្រូវ​សម្រួល មិន​មែន​រារាំង​ពួកគេ​នោះ​ទេ»

លោក ស៊ូប៊ែឌី បាន​បន្ត​ថា ដោយ​លទ្ធផល​បោះឆ្នោត​ផ្លូវ​ការ​បង្ហាញ​ប្រជាជន​គាំទ្រ​គណបក្ស​ពីរ​ផ្សេង​ គ្នា​ក្នុង​សំឡេង​ឆ្នោត​ជិត​ស្មើ​គ្នា លោក​សោក​ស្តាយ​ចំពោះ​ការ​បរាជ័យ​របស់​គណបក្ស​ទាំង​ពីរ​ដើម្បី សម្រេច​បាន​នូវ​ការ​សម្រុះ​សម្រួល​គ្នា ហើយ​កាន់​តែ​សោក​ស្តាយ​ថែម​ទៀត​ដែល​រដ្ឋសភា​បើក​សម័យ​ប្រជុំ​ដោយ​គ្មាន​ តំណាង​រាស្រ្ត​គណបក្ស​សង្គ្រោះ​ជាតិ​ទាំង ៥៥ រូប។

លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី ក៏​បាន​រិះគន់​ចំពោះ​ដំណើរការ​ស៊ើប​អង្កេត​ក្រោយ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត លើ​ភាព​មិន​ប្រក្រតី​នៃ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត ដែល​អនុវត្ត​តាម​តែ​មធ្យោបាយ​ដែល​ចែង​ក្នុង​រដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ គឺ​ផ្អែក​លើ​គណៈកម្មាធិការ​ជាតិ​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត និង​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​ធម្មនុញ្ញ​ដែល​ទទួល​រង​ការ​រិះគន់​យ៉ាង​ខ្លាំង។ លោក​បាន​បន្ត​ថា៖ «ការ​ទទូច​ធ្វើ​តាម​តែ​យន្តការ​ផ្លូវ​ការ​នៃ​លទិ្ធ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ដោយ​មិន​ គិត​ពី​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​ជា​មូលដ្ឋាន​នេះ នឹង​ជា​ការ​ផ្ទុយ​នឹង​គោល​បំណង​របស់​រដ្ឋ​ធម្មនុញ្ញ»

លោក ឯក ថា អ្នក​នាំ​ពាក្យ​ម្នាក់​នៃ​ទីស្តី​ការ​គណៈ​រដ្ឋ​មន្រ្តី​បាន​ថ្លែង​ថា អ្វី​គ្រប់​យ៉ាង​ដែល​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​បាន​ធ្វើ​ក្នុង​រយៈ​ពេល​ក្រោយ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត ​នេះ បាន​ធ្វើ​ឡើង​តាម​អត្ថបទ​ច្បាប់ និង​លទ្ធផល​បោះឆ្នោត​។

លោក​បាន​បន្ថែម​ថា៖ «យើង​បាន​អនុវត្ត​តាម​នីតិរដ្ឋ​នៅ​កម្ពុជា ទាក់​ទង​នឹង​ការ​បង្កើត​រដ្ឋសភា​ថ្មី និង​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ថ្មី។ យើង​មិន​បាន​ធ្វើ​អ្វី​ខុស​ទេ យើង​គោរព​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស និង​លទិ្ធ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ»

លោក​បាន​បន្ថែម​ថា សេចក្តី​លម្អិត​អំពី​អ្វី​ដែល​បាន​កើត​ឡើង​នៅ វត្តភ្នំ កាល​ពី​ល្ងាច​ថ្ងៃ​អាទិត្យ មិន​ទាន់​អាច​ពន្យល់​បាន​ទេ រហូត​ទាល់​តែ​ការ​ស៊ើប​អង្កេត​បាន​ធ្វើ​ចប់។

លោក​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ទៀត​ថា៖ «យើង​មិន​អាច​និយាយ​អ្វី​ទេ បើ​គ្មាន​ការ​ស៊ើប​អង្កេត​អ្នក​មិន​អាច​ឈាន​ដល់​សេចក្តី​សន្និដ្ឋាន​ទេ។ ខ្ញុំ​អាច​ប្រាប់​អ្នក​ថា​រាជ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា​ដឹង​ថា តើ​យើង​កំពុង​ធ្វើ​ការ​ដើម្បី​ប្រយោជន៍​ប្រជាជន និង​ប្រទេស»។ ខណៈ​ដែល​លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី ផ្តោត​លើ «ការ​វិវត្ត​ល្អ» ខ្លះ ក្នុង​អំឡុង​រយៈ​ពេល​បោះឆ្នោត លោក​បាន​អំពាវនាវ​ឲ្យ​មាន​កំណែ​ទម្រង់​ទ្វេ​បក្ស។ លោក​បញ្ជាក់​ថា៖ «សេចក្តី​ថ្លែង​ការណ៍​រួម​គ្នា​ដោយ​គណបក្ស​នយោបាយ​ទាំង​ពីរ ដើម្បី​សម្រេច​បាន​នូវ​កំណែ​ទម្រង់​ច្បាស់​លាស់​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​អាទិភាព​នឹង​ ធានា​ជា​ថ្មី​ចំពោះ​សហគមន៍​អន្តរជាតិ និង​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា» លោក​ក៏​បាន​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​មាន​ការ​បន្ត​ពិភាក្សា​នៅ​ថ្នាក់​កំពូល​រវាង​គណបក្ស​ ទាំង​អស់​។

លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី បាន​បង្ហាញ​របាយ​ការណ៍​ចុង​ក្រោយ​ជា​ផ្លូវ​ការ ដែល​ចេញ​ផ្សាយ​នៅ​ខែ សីហា ដល់​អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ​បន្ទាប់​ពី​លោក​បាន​ធ្វើ​បេសកកម្ម​ស្វែង​រក​ការ​ ពិត​ចំនួន​ពីរ​លើក​មក​កាន់​កម្ពុជា កាល​ពី​ឆ្នាំ​មុន។ អង្គការ​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​បាន​ថ្លែង​ថា អាណតិ្ត​របស់​លោក​ជា​អ្នក​រាយការណ៍​ពិសេស​អាច​បញ្ចប់​ក្នុង​អំឡុង សម័យ​ប្រជុំ​របស់​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​នេះ ប្រសិន​បើ​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​មិន​ចេញ​ដំណោះស្រាយ​បន្ត​អាណតិ្ត​នោះ​ទេ។

សហព័ន្ធ​អន្តរជាតិ​ដើម្បី​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស ដែល​តំណាង​អង្គការ អាដហុក និង លីកាដូ បាន​ថ្លែង​នៅ​អង្គ​ប្រជុំ​កាល​ពី​ម្សិលមិញ។

លោក Nicolas Agostini ប្រតិភូ​សហព័ន្ធ​អន្តរជាតិ​ដើម្បី​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​ប្រចាំ​នៅ​អង្គការ សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ​បាន​ថ្លែង​ថា សហព័ន្ធ​នឹង​អំពាវនាវ​ដល់​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​អង្គការ​សហ​ ប្រជាជាតិ​ឲ្យ​អនុម័ត​ដំណោះស្រាយ​រឹងមាំ ថ្កោល​ទោស​ការ​រំលោភ​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​នៅ​កម្ពុជា និង​បន្ត​អាណតិ្ត​របស់​លោក ស៊ូប៊ែរឌី សម្រាប់​រយៈ​ពេល ២ឆ្នាំ។

លោក​បាន​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​តាម​អ៊ីមែល​ថា៖ «មាន​ហានិភ័យ​ពិត​ប្រាកដ ដែល​អាណតិ្ត​នឹង​ចុះ​ថយ​ដល់​កម្រិត​ជំនួយ​បច្ចេកទេស ដែល​មាន​ន័យ​ថា អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ​នឹង​បាត់បង់​សមត្ថកិច្ច​ឃ្លាំ​មើល​ទាក់​ទង​នឹង​ស្ថាន​ ការណ៍​សិទិ្ធ​មនុស្ស​នៅ​កម្ពុជា»
តំណាង​កម្ពុជា ប្រចាំ​អង្គការ​សហ​ប្រជាជាតិ នឹង​ឆ្លើយ​តប​ចំពោះ​សេចក្តី​ថ្លែង​របស់​លោក ស៊ូប៊ែឌី នេះ​ហើយ​ដំណោះស្រាយ​នឹង​ធ្វើ​ឡើង​នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​សុក្រ៕