G20 Syria divide: World’s largest nations
speak out against US-led strike
RT - September 06, 2013
Group
photographs of the heads of the delegations of the BRICS countries. From left:
President of the Federative Republic of Brazil Dilma Vana Rousseff, Prime
Minister of the Republic of India Manmohan Singh, President of the Russian
Federation Vladimir Putin, President of the People's Republic of China Xi
Jinping and President of the Republic of South Africa Jacob Zuma (RIA Novosti /
Igor Russak)
As leaders of countries making up
half of the world’s population firmly opposed military action against Syria
without a UN mandate, the US kept pushing for a strike, claiming that many
countries represented at the G20 summit were “comfortable” with it.
Although discussion of the Syrian
conflict was never officially on the G20 agenda, world leaders used their
statements and speeches to outline their stance on a possible US-led military
strike against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has
dismissed the notion that there was a 50/50 split of opinion on the issue,
alluding that leaders of the majority of the world’s largest economies clearly
stated their opposition to military intervention in Syria.
Russia, China, India, Indonesia,
Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa were among the countries that openly spoke
out against military action not authorized by the UN Security Council, Putin
revealed.
Putin himself said that he believes
the alleged chemical weapons attack was nothing more than “a provocation on
behalf of the armed insurgents in hope of the help from the outside, from the
countries which supported them from day one.”
Taking
a stand against a US-led strike
During his closing speech at the G20
summit, the Russian President pointed out that the world’s most populous
Muslim-majority nation – Indonesia – was among those “categorically opposed”
to a strike against Syria.
Indonesia has been calling on the
international community to refrain from extrajudicial justice on Syria, and to
wait until UN investigators publish the results of their work.
“Indonesia’s stance is clear. President
Yudhoyono has said that, while affirming that the use of chemical weapons
against innocent civilians cannot be accepted, we need to ensure who actually
carried out the attacks. In this sense, we should wait for the UN’s inspection
team to announce the result of its investigation,” Indonesian Foreign
Minister Marty Natalegawa said in a statement published on President Susilo
Bambang Yudhoyono’s official website.
“International responses should
not lead to more and worse humanitarian problems. The misery of the Syrian
people has been too long and we need to ensure there is no military approach
used, but instead peaceful diplomatic measures must be utilized to settle the
problems,” Natalegawa added.
China has consistently opposed a
military solution for the Syrian crisis, joining Russia in its belief that any
action must be based on the UN investigation and authorized by the UN Security
Council.
Chinese Foreign Ministry
spokesperson Qin Gang told RT at the summit that it is “vitally important”
that any move on Syria be based on the UN investigation, stressing that China
is “against the use of chemical weapons by any countries or organizations.”
“China and Russia are both
appealing to the countries concerned to be serious about the possible
consequences of the use of military means without the mandate of the UN
Security Council,” Qin added, reminding that recent history has shown that
such means “can’t solve a complicated issue like Syria.”
Meanwhile, China’s vice finance
minister, Zhu Guangyao, has warned that a strike would have a negative impact
on the global economy and “cause a hike in the oil price.”
Other members of the BRICS bloc of
emerging economies – Brazil, India and South Africa – also voiced their firm
opposition to the possibility of a US-led military strike.
Any action on Syria should be taken
within the UN framework, and only after the UN releases the results of the
chemical weapons investigation, India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stressed.
While condemning the use of chemical
weapons by any party, Singh told G20 leaders that one needs to be certain what
has really happened in Syria, according to Indian Planning Commission Deputy
Chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia, who spoke to reporters at the summit.
South African President Jacob Zuma
slammed the idea of a military intervention in Syria on the eve of the summit,
saying that one cannot “remain silent when one country is being bombed to
ashes before our eyes.”
Zuma stressed that the UN is “the
only authority that can intervene militarily in any country,” in his speech
earlier this week.
“We don’t want the world to be run
by individuals, but a collective in the form of the UN. I don't know if people
who are questioning our position on Syria have an alternative,” Zuma said.
President Putin on Friday quoted his
South African counterpart as saying that the world’s smaller countries feel “increasingly
vulnerable and insecure” with the notion that a more powerful nation can “at
any time and at its own discretion use force against them.”
In this regard, a military strike
outside of a UN Security Council resolution would set a dangerous precedent,
Putin warned.
“The use of force on a sovereign
state is only possible if it is done for self-defense – and, as we know, Syria
is not attacking the US – or under a decision made by the UN Security Council.
As one participant in our discussion said, those who act otherwise put
themselves outside of law,” Putin said.
Against military strike
|
Population
|
For military strike
|
Population
|
Russia
|
143,400,000
|
US
|
316,597,000
|
China
|
1,353,821,000
|
Turkey
|
75,627,384
|
India
|
1,210,193,422
|
Canada
|
33,476,688
|
Indonesia
|
237,424,363
|
Saudi Arabia
|
29,195,895
|
Argentina
|
41,660,417
|
France
|
65,350,000
|
Brazil
|
201,032,714
|
Australia
|
23,173,142
|
South Africa
|
52,981,991
|
Japan
|
126,659,683
|
Republic of Korea
|
50,219,669
|
||
UK
|
63,181,775
|
||
Italy
|
59,685,227
|
||
TOTAL
|
3,240,513,907
|
843,166,463
|
|
*Germany has decided to stay
neutral
*EU, a full member of the G20, does not take a unified stand yet |
The following link has more of that story.
No comments:
Post a Comment